Skip to main content
Joshua Eastin
Block D
12/13/2018
Radio Ripple effect

The radio give one of history's best and most influential examples of technology changing how people interact with their society. As radio evolved from a military device to a common amenity it also evolved american culture giving america the strongest national identity of the early 20th century. This unprecedented advancement was accomplished through the radio’s ability to give marketers access to a new form mass market giving exposure which newspaper could never achieve. Corporations were not the only ones to take advantage of this new medium, politicians and musicians also became common on the radio. This lead america into a national identity which would be a primary cause of the Americana culture of the early 1950’s.
The invention of radio is usually stated in the range of 1890’s to early 1900’s but its invention can be traced back as far as the 1850’s when experimentation of low frequency waves began. However, this raises a question: if americans had access to this technology years prior then why did it only become a consumer product in the early 1930’s? This can be explained by two reasons; the first being that the equipment was simply too difficult to use for an average consumer until 1910 when it became more adapted for military use. This reason still does not explain why the radio only gained popularity in the 1930’s. Henretta America’s History textbook gives the reason that america experienced a particularly wealthy change in the economy. This gave consumers more wealth which resulted in more buying power and willingness to buy from consumers. Consumerism swept the nation now ordinary working class people could afford luxuries such as radio. The fact that the radio was not only used by the wealthy would become an important factor in how it us used by marketers.
Radio was loved by marketers giving more exposure than ever possible. The University of Minnesota list the several reasons that radio was more effective than newspaper. While news paper could only be read at home, it was impossible to escape the constant cry of the radio. Restaurants, public areas, even in some workplaces the distorted murmur of a radio could be heard. Another reason was that newspaper could have intriguing art and eye catching headlines the radio possessed unique the ability to speak directly to consumers, this was an entirely new stimulus and the american public was fascinated by it. Children and adults became entranced by the radio gathering around and just looking at the radio. This undivided attention was a goldmine for advertisers. The radio’s success in advertising perpetuated the consumerism of the 30’s past the second world war. Even the war itself could be seen as evidence of radio propaganda.
Another influential result of the radio was the national identity it established in american culture. The nation was brought closer together after being able to hear other americans from distant part of the country. America became more aware of public opinion 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Semester II Final

Part A: 1. Before doing any research, I predict the three most highly ranked presidents in US history will be: President Abraham Lincoln provided a way to create unity in the United States while progressing the moral values of the country. George Washington would likely be near the top of that list due to the work he put forward in creating the nation. Jefferson would also be considered a successful president after making the Louisiana perchance which vastly expanded US territory. and the worst might be, when evaluating by public opinion, are the most recent presidents due to the increasingly dividing political climate. Nixon is also remembered as one of the worst presidents due to his involvement in Water Gate. 2. According the the C-Span Survey  the presidents who are consistently in the top 4 are: Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Theodore Roosevelt. While there were no two presidents who went back a forth in the 4th and 5th slots as Theodore ...

Source Use & Citation

1. From analyzing Bess' work with his sources, what standards or rules does he seem to be following for citing his work? During the first mention of a source he fully states: the authors first and last name, title of the work, publisher, and year of publication. When citing a source previously cited he shortens to last name, title, then page number; if the source is mentioned twice consecutively he uses 'Ibid' to shorten the citation even further. 2. Bess' work provides us with example of "Annotated" notes. (Examples: 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 25). Based on these examples, what do you understand annotated to mean? Annotated in this context means to give credibility and specific relevance to the example used. 3. Are there sources in the notes that are not MENTIONED directly and explicitly in the text itself? If so, what rule seems to apply? How might he be making that determination? In note 8 he mentions Reading the Holocaust  and Morality after Auschwitz altho...

12 years a slave review

Summary: 12 years a slave Manhola Dargis from the New York times states in his review that 12 years a slave is an excellent example of how awful slavery in America really was. Manhola gives further examples of how the movie shows a lack of morality; his examples of immoral actions include: Solomon capture, his work in the various plantations, and the treatment of his fellow slaves. Manhola finds these topics extremely powerful and uncomfortable and difficult to show in theaters but he points to the exceptional work of the creators of the movies as to how it accomplishes its goal. Manhola elaborates on this by saying "it reminds you how infrequently stories about slavery have been told on the big screen" showing how little this story is told and even more rare to be told to such a high standard. The Blood and Tears, Not the Magnolias