2.2 - Success Factors

Opportunity

Luck

Hard Work

Skill

While all four of these factors are invaluable to achieving economic success opportunity is by far the most important. This is because all three of the other factors are useless without opportunity. Hard work becomes meaningless without a somewhere to direct it, the same reasoning applies to skill. Luck and Opportunity can be looked at as the same. The more opportunity you have for success the more likely you are to achieve it. Luck reaches the same end but without the ability to control how many chances you have. Hard work and skill are also similar in the same way as luck and opportunity. Having either in excess fulfills the same need. However, Hard work is more valuable than skill for 2 reasons: without any hard work skill limits itself and, more importantly, hard work can generate opportunity which make hard work far more valuable.

Quote source

Comments

Semester II Final

Part A: 1. Before doing any research, I predict the three most highly ranked presidents in US history will be: President Abraham Lincoln provided a way to create unity in the United States while progressing the moral values of the country. George Washington would likely be near the top of that list due to the work he put forward in creating the nation. Jefferson would also be considered a successful president after making the Louisiana perchance which vastly expanded US territory. and the worst might be, when evaluating by public opinion, are the most recent presidents due to the increasingly dividing political climate. Nixon is also remembered as one of the worst presidents due to his involvement in Water Gate. 2. According the the C-Span Survey the presidents who are consistently in the top 4 are: Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Theodore Roosevelt. While there were no two presidents who went back a forth in the 4th and 5th slots as Theodore ...

Source Use & Citation

1. From analyzing Bess' work with his sources, what standards or rules does he seem to be following for citing his work? During the first mention of a source he fully states: the authors first and last name, title of the work, publisher, and year of publication. When citing a source previously cited he shortens to last name, title, then page number; if the source is mentioned twice consecutively he uses 'Ibid' to shorten the citation even further. 2. Bess' work provides us with example of "Annotated" notes. (Examples: 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 25). Based on these examples, what do you understand annotated to mean? Annotated in this context means to give credibility and specific relevance to the example used. 3. Are there sources in the notes that are not MENTIONED directly and explicitly in the text itself? If so, what rule seems to apply? How might he be making that determination? In note 8 he mentions Reading the Holocaust and Morality after Auschwitz altho...

12 years a slave review

Summary: 12 years a slave Manhola Dargis from the New York times states in his review that 12 years a slave is an excellent example of how awful slavery in America really was. Manhola gives further examples of how the movie shows a lack of morality; his examples of immoral actions include: Solomon capture, his work in the various plantations, and the treatment of his fellow slaves. Manhola finds these topics extremely powerful and uncomfortable and difficult to show in theaters but he points to the exceptional work of the creators of the movies as to how it accomplishes its goal. Manhola elaborates on this by saying "it reminds you how infrequently stories about slavery have been told on the big screen" showing how little this story is told and even more rare to be told to such a high standard. The Blood and Tears, Not the Magnolias

Joshua's Blog

Search This Blog